Friday, January 30, 2015

Chess Improvement; Balanced yet Revolutionary

Many Fridays I feel philosophical,  as my weeks chess improvement efforts all get catalogued and scrutinized- just before my weekend; which sometimes is quite chessic; with lots of gameplay and study (Club night is Sunday) and other times can see very little effort, as other family activities take center stage.

I also wanted to rush to print a new chess blog; because sometimes writing the blog has taken too much time and effort; and becomes distracting to my study.  I’m Not an author, and I don’t get either fame or income from my writings.  Fundamentally, The “great Patzer” is just that!  A Patzer!  The title reflects the truth that my take on chess and chess improvement are all just guesses (however shrewd),  and that I speak with no authority on any this. 

The Point of Blogging.  So with that said, one might ask what is the point of blogging then.  Well, its IMHO truly not to assume airs, boast, or build a following.   Blogging, for me is quite personal.   Fact is, its not so easy to routinely give an average of an hour + of rigorous study to chess.   And Most books, frankly, have pretty covers compared to the monumental effort it truly takes to really make their insights your own.   In my mind, then Blogging, is about creating a personal narrative, and holding yourself to a public standard.  Comments and questions I’m sure are always appreciated any where in blogosphere, but the magic is to commit yourself, to all the world, to give an honest attempt at your best effort in improving in this game.   In that regard, carefully scrutinizing what you intend to do- and making the best effort to do it, makes you “great” irregardless of your elo score.

Nevertheless, a few blogs have got me thinking; and one I can’t help to shout out about.  Pawn-to-rook-4 has passed his anniversary with an Elo increase of 700 points.  http://p-r4.blogspot.com/.  Which is absolutely an incredible achievement IMHO!  It is Always inspirational to see success of a fellow blogger. 

Personally Speaking; This is  a time of a lot of tweaking.  As you might remember I have pretty intricate and different system for tracking my effort- and motivating me to keep up with my studies.   The whole system might be worthy of a post of itself- but – lets just say that recently we’ve been tweaking things pretty good.   my system is meant to create a motivational ELO scored, from all the effort that I put into it.   There’s a lot of “wild guess” factors in it; and I’ve been looking at them and messing around with the factors.

I see Two important attributes (broadly) of a successful chess improvement system. 

 The first is that, a chess improvement system must have Balance!  Its absolutely not enough to just Play this game and hope to make sustained improvement.  Sooner of later the effort to internalize some set of principles will merely create habit.  And an attribute you wanted in your game will become a limitation in your effort to improve beyond that.   I find the concept of balance Challenging; because I am naturally a passionate guy.  If I find something engaging- I can totally blow it all out of proportion.

The second is that a chess improvement system must be revolutionary.   That is if we don’t take big steps and reach towards an entirely different way of looking at the game; inevitably the law of declining rewards kick in.   one soon gets lethargic and small minded about the game.  perhaps a sense of comfortableness settles in.  Other people’s “big insights are, of course, off and not Right for me.”  It just reeks of a big plateau!  To get beyond it, we are going to have to do some unlearning.   We are generally going to have to accept that the game is bigger that our limited repertoire of ideas, patterns, strategies,and tactics allow.

The Two together Form something of a Dichotomy.   That is, how do I expand my vision without jettisoning current efforts to internalize what I know?   But as I see it, the real answer is that we must reach for knowledge that is beyond us, and skill we don’t currently have.  The ideal, perhaps, force of this is a coach.  And I have confidence that a good trainer has the experience and develops the ability to help his students Reach new understanding in the game, by building upon what he knows.

Barring,a coach, we must look to some Resource (or resources), to find insight beyond our set of skills.  Books are perhaps the least expensive and universal means to get this.  (though in our increasingly digital world, there is insight available in many media).  But a listing of good and useful books; is Far beyond the scope of this blog.  

I want to reach towards my books and look for way to solidify what I know and bring new insight to the game!  Posts for a different day (after a have more experience to offer).

The NEW revolution for me; Annotations.   Again PTR4 brought it up; and he has impressively read through thousands of annotated games.  Contained in all those games is many practical and useful insights; I lack.   It’s not just enough to note that I can’t predict the winning play of an instructive game from Fisher and Capablanca.  The bigger point is that I don’t even understand the point of their play.

So this brings me to two points about playing through master level games  A) I need to continue to work through these kinds of games, since they clearly represent a measure of positional skill I do not have  and B)  I need to Look for Annotations and preferably instructive ones at that- to seek to understand  WHY they played as they did..  Strait up unexplained analysis can be miserably un-instructive.

Oh and C)  (I can’t count just not today!)… I need to make playing through annotations a permanent and repetitive learning experience.  I have been too guilty of just accepting that need to do them and putting them off.

Annotated Games are my Third revolution (and need to follow,)
·        tactical puzzles- started in August and still going on strong)
·        CC- specifically Turn based chess; started in Nov/Dec and has encouraged me to take analysis to new heights.

As I said, blogs are a personal commitment and I commit to working through annotations, at least, every 2-3 days.

I want to lastly add, that this is not necessarily about whole game annotations;   I have seen some great miniatures in several books.  What I’ve not done is take them seriously enough.  Until now.

CHESS LAW #the next one.   Regularly Looking through Annotations, for insights beyond your rating, allows you to leap beyond your current limitations, while solid efforts call for the constant practicing of what you already know.

Friday, January 23, 2015


So… clearly my blog has gotten a little less active.  Its clearly easier to (with a burst of enthusiasm) put out several Introductory Posts then to be the regular day –after-day blogger. Nonetheless, as in chess itself, One must insist upon being consistent if one is to get achieve anything.  Anything less than a sustained effort, and all results become cheap and hollow.   We reap the benefit of our whim, which I most things falls far short of our potential. 

Mining Salt.   As I indicated a little while back, I was aiming to go back to mine ‘salt’ as its called.  That is Lots of relatively simple problems done with the aim of rapid pattern recognition.   However, I insist that such an activity must be done analytically!   Yes, easy problems are recognized readily.   The Very point of the activity is to make forceful important tactical victories simple and rapid to solve.  BUT, the very point of the turn based chess, is that I am not methodical, careful enough.   My analysis is too superficial! In short, I go into some variations calculating a positional win, missing some “all too simple” defect in my own idea.  And when I don’t see some the refuted win, my game becomes hard to understand and aimless.   My aimless game can be far too passive; missing ways that the opponent can seize initiative and push his way through a faltering defense. 

In short, I can’t afford to allow mining salt cheapen my lightweight analytical vision.   So playing this stuff quickly is off the table.  There’s no thousands of knight forks in two days for me!   Instead, I’m currently taking on the easy stuff and putting into words the stated pattern.   The point is to amass various tags for each tactical problem.  Of course this slows me down, but that is exactly the point…. And of  course an important balance between the games (G30; Otb or via chess.com);  turn based chess and the tactics.

CHESS RULE #3.  Chess study is about Balance and not being excessive about anything.   Never play something So fast that your not absorbing the point, never do something so slow, that you can’t make routine progress in your understanding of it.  

Anyways the motif idea is NOT original. Chess tempo has already catalogued its vast collection.   I expecting some useful information to emerge when I can analyze the patterns- motif versus time (for example).   But I still think the Point is to force the mind, to methodically consider all the different kinds of patterns in forceful chess tactics.   In short ,as I said before

CHESS RULE #4.  What you name becomes real to you.   This is and always was the big point of naming chess variations.  

Thus allowing chess tempo to do the naming defeats the purpose of even having a name.  IMHO

My Games have gotten unusually hot recently.   Finally feeling a little better and I put in a good bit more time on chess tactics.   The last three games got tactically unusually hot.   And I intend to showcase one of my more recent victories;   we were grinding along in a tense but relatively quiet place and he found a fork, but I think at the same time, he loosened an important defender and the game went crazy.   But lets Do this right and show you how it all went down

G30 GAME.  Chess.com
Darjan82 versus Myself
Colle Opening

  1. d4        d5
  2. e3        Nf6     
  3. Bd3      Nc6
  4. h3        e5
  5. dxe5     Nxe5
  6. Nf3      Bd6
  7. Nc3     b6
  8. O-O     Bb7
  9. Re1      O-O
  10. a3        Nxd3 (B)
  11. cxd3     c5

t


w

t
l

o
n



o
o
o

o

n

j




o
o












p

h
p
p
h

p

p
p


p
p

r

b
q
r

k



We’re clearly out of the opening and Darjan is playing rapidly.  he took a little more a minute to get to Nf3 and now he’s used 4:80 to my 7:15.  As a colle, (an opening I used to play), it looks a little off to advance the end pawns and to allow the black bishop to be exchanged.  

  1. b4        cxb4
  2. axb4     Bxb4
  3. Qb3     a5
  4. Ba3      Bxc3
  5. Qxc3    Rc8



t
w

t
l


n



o
o
o

o



j


o


o












b

q
p
p
h

p





p
p

r



r

k



He’s still playing fast.  (16 moves in 5:45 or 22 seconds per move) Though the next few moves slow him down.   I am probably moving a little fast too, ( 16 moves in 10:49 or 40 seconds per move)  though the next many moves called for a lot of accuracy.  When one  guy is cruising at top speed through chess he might not be  understanding you just have to be a  little slower and more careful to win. (post edit—16.  b4, I think gains material)

  1. Qd4     Re8
  2. Rb1      Nd7
  3. Nh4     Ba6
  4. Nf5      Qg5
  5. Nd6     Ne5



t

t

l






o
o
o
n
o

h




o


o
j

w




q




b


p
p


p





p
p


r


r

k


He’s got me in a fork, but although he’s been aggressive, I’ve got some crazy counter-play coming.   Chief amoung them is Nf3 with a knight fork against the Queen.

  1. Qxb6   Bxd3
  2. Qb7     Be4
  3. g3…. (Nf3)



t

t

l


q



o
o
o



h




o


o
j

w





n



b



p
p

p






p


r


r

k


The pawn thrust does stop mate, but in no way does it diminish my play, since g pawn is pinned.   Instead after (Nf3),  white will have to move the King.  By this time though I think he’s panicking and not playing too good at all. Its important to note that moving the black knight does allow for Qxf7+, but as long as white hangs upto g file; white has no time to make the most of his aggressively posted pieces.  

The rest of moves showcase him walking from check to check, then, rattled, hanging his Queen.

  1. Kh1     Nxe1+
  2. Kg1     Nf3+
  3. Kf1      Nd2+
  4. Ke1     Nxb1
  5. Qxb1??  (the Bishop at f4 is eyeing b1, and black would be many pieces up with hope for white)



t

t

l






o
o
o



h




o


o


w





n



b



p

p
p





p



q


k